Medical Management of Traumatic Vertebral Artery Injury Is Safe Regardless of the Severity of Injury.

BACKGROUND: Management of traumatic vertebral artery injury (VAI) remains under debate. Current consensus reserves surgical or endovascular management for high-grade injury in order to prevent stroke. We sought to evaluate the factors that influence posterior fossa stroke outcomes following traumatic VAI. METHODS: A search of the prospectively maintained PROOVIT trauma registry of patients older than 18 years of age with a diagnosis of VAI was performed at a level 1 trauma center from 2013 to 2019. Patient demographics, type of injury, the timing of presentation, Biffl Classification of Cerebrovascular Injury Grade score, medical management, procedural interventions, and stroke outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: VAIs were identified in 66 trauma patients were identified out of 14,323 patients entered into the PROOVIT registry. The dominant mechanism was blunt injury (91.5% vs. 8.5%, blunt versus penetrating). Nine patients presented with symptomatic ipsilateral posterior circulation strokes visible on imaging. The average Biffl classification grade was similar between the stroke and nonstroke groups (2.0 vs. 1.5; P = 0.39). The average injury severity score (ISS) between stroke and nonstroke groups was also similar (9.0 vs. 14.0; P = 0.35). All 9 patients in the stroke group had magnetic resonance imaging verification of their infarct within an average of 21.2 hr from presentation. In the stroke group, 1 patient underwent diagnostic angiography but had no intervention. In the nonstroke group, all were treated with medical management alone and none underwent vertebral artery intervention. During a mean follow-up of 14.5 months, no patients experienced a new neurological deficit. CONCLUSIONS: The severity of VAI by Biffl grading and ISS are not associated with ischemic stroke at presentation following VAI. Medical management of VAI appears safe regardless of Biffl and ISS staging in this trauma population. Neurological changes related to embolic stroke were generally appreciated on presentation. Conservative medical management was sufficient to protect from secondary neurological deficit regardless of index vertebral injury.

Development of a convolutional neural network to detect abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Objective: We sought to train a foundational convolutional neural network (CNN) for screening computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA) scans for the presence of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) for future predictive modeling and other artificial intelligence applications. Methods: From January 2015 to January 2020, a HIPAA (Health Insurance and Accountability Act)-compliant, institutional review board-approved, retrospective clinical study analyzed contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic CTA scans from 200 patients with infrarenal AAAs and 200 propensity-matched control patients with non-aneurysmal infrarenal abdominal aortas. A CNN was trained to binary classification on the input. For model improvement and testing, transfer learning using the ImageNet database was applied to the VGG-16 base model. The image dataset was randomized to sets of 60%, 10%, and 30% for model training, validation, and testing, respectively. A stochastic gradient descent was used for optimization. The models were assessed by testing validation accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Preliminary data demonstrated a nonrandom pattern of accuracy and detectability. Iterations (≤10) of the model characteristics generated a final custom CNN model reporting an accuracy of 99.1% and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.99. Misjudgments were analyzed through review of the heat maps generated via gradient weighted class activation mapping overlaid on the original CT images. The greatest misjudgments were seen in small aneurysms (<3.3 cm) with mural thrombus. Conclusions: Preliminary data from a CNN model have shown that the model can accurately screen and identify CTA findings of infrarenal AAAs. This model serves as a proof-of-concept to proceed with potential future directions to include expansion to predictive modeling and other artificial intelligence-based applications.

AAST multicenter prospective analysis of prehospital tourniquet use for extremity trauma.

BACKGROUND: Tourniquet use for extremity hemorrhage control has seen a recent increase in civilian usage. Previous retrospective studies demonstrated that tourniquets improve outcomes for major extremity trauma (MET). No prospective study has been conducted to date. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes in MET patients with prehospital tourniquet use. We hypothesized that prehospital tourniquet use in MET decreases the incidence of patients arriving to the trauma center in shock. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively for adult patients with MET at 26 Level I and 3 Level II trauma centers from 2015 to 2020. Limbs with tourniquets applied in the prehospital setting were included in the tourniquet group and limbs without prehospital tourniquets were enrolled in the control group. RESULTS: A total of 1,392 injured limbs were enrolled with 1,130 tourniquets, including 962 prehospital tourniquets. The control group consisted of 262 limbs without prehospital tourniquets and 88 with tourniquets placed upon hospital arrival. Prehospital improvised tourniquets were placed in 42 patients. Tourniquets effectively controlled bleeding in 87.7% of limbs. Tourniquet and control groups were similarly matched for demographics, Injury Severity Score, and prehospital vital signs (p > 0.05). Despite higher limb injury severity, patients in the tourniquet group were less likely to arrive in shock compared with the control group (13.0% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.04). The incidence of limb complications was not significantly higher in the tourniquet group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study is the first prospective analysis of prehospital tourniquet use for civilian extremity trauma. Prehospital tourniquet application was associated with decreased incidence of arrival in shock without increasing limb complications. We found widespread tourniquet use, high effectiveness, and a low number of improvised tourniquets. This study provides further evidence that tourniquets are being widely and safely adopted to improve outcomes in civilians with MET. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.

Pediatric Renal Artery Stenosis: A 19-Year Experience in Management and Outcomes at a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Renal artery stenosis (RAS) is an uncommon cause of pediatric hypertension. Guidelines for workup and management have not been established. The most widely reported etiology of the pediatric renovascular disease has been fibromuscular dysplasia; however, other etiologies including middle aortic syndrome (MAS) and vasculitides have been described. We reviewed cases of radiologically identified pediatric RAS and describe etiologies, management, and long-term clinical outcomes in our patients. METHODS: Reports for duplex ultrasound, computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and conventional angiography from an academic children's hospital between 2000 and 2019 were evaluated. Positive reports for RAS were confirmed by a vascular surgeon and a radiologist. Demographics, indications for evaluation, management, and long-term clinical outcomes were documented. Data are summarized as count (n), geometric mean, median, or standard deviation as appropriate. Univariate differences between treatment cohorts were analyzed using Chi-squared tests for categorical variables. Nonparametric paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann-Whitney U-test were used for the analysis of paired ordinal or continuous data. A statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) with significance defined at a P < 0.05 level. RESULTS: Imaging for suspected RAS was performed on 984 children. Of the 38 patients with positive imaging for RAS, 60.5% were idiopathic, 31.5% (n = 12) had concomitant congenital/systemic comorbidity, and 21.0% (n = 8) had RAS and concomitant aortic pathology. Fibromuscular dysplasia only accounted for 13.2% (n = 5) of patients. Regarding management, 34.2% (n = 13) underwent invasive intervention, 23.7% (n = 9) underwent endovascular intervention alone, and 10.5% (n = 4) underwent endovascular plus surgical intervention. Conservative management was performed for 65.8% (n = 25) of patients at a long-term follow-up (33.8 months), 34.2% (n = 13) requiring only lifestyle changes, and 31.6% (n = 12) requiring only medical management. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric RAS is a low-frequency disease and long-term outcomes have been under-reported. The incidence of associated aortic pathology in our intervention cohort appears higher than that was previously reported. A long-term follow-up demonstrated that up to 65.8% of patients could be managed successfully with conservative therapy.

More medications, more problems: results from the Sedation Level after Emergent Exlap with Packing for TRAUMA (SLEEP-TRAUMA) study.

PURPOSE: Sedation management of trauma patients after damage control laparotomy (DCL) has not been optimized. We evaluated if shorter sedation exposure was associated with increased proportion of delirium-free/coma-free (DF/CF-ICU) days and change in time to definitive fascial closure (DFC). METHODS: We reviewed trauma DCL patients at an ACS-verified level I center over 5 years as shorter (SE) or longer than median (LE) sedation exposure. We compared demographics, injury patterns, hemodynamic parameters, and injury severity between groups. We calculated the propensity for each patient to achieve DFC using age, gender, ISS, red blood cell transfusion, bowel discontinuity, abdominal vascular injury, and time to first takeback; we then determined the effect of sedation exposure on rate of DFC by multivariate Cox regression, adjusted for propensity to achieve DFC. We used linear regression adjusted for age, ISS, head-AIS, bowel discontinuity, and vascular injury to determine the effect of sedation exposure on the proportion of DF/CF-ICU days. RESULTS: 65 patients (33.8% penetrating) had mean age 41.8 ± 16.0, ISS 27.1 ± 14.2, Head-AIS 1.2 ± 1.6 and median sedation exposure of 2.2 [IQR 0.78, 7.3] days (35 SE and 30 LE). Pattern and severity of solid organ injuries and proportion of small and large bowel and vascular injuries were similar between groups. LE had more abdominal sepsis (23.3% vs 0%, p = 0.003) and enterocutaneous fistula (16.7% vs 0%, p = 0.016), and more ventilator (17.3 ± 12.7 vs 6.1 ± 6.8, p < 0.001), ICU (20.8 ± 14.2 vs 7.2 ± 7.6, p < 0.001), and hospital days (29.6 ± 19.6 vs 13.9 ± 9.0, p < 0.001). DFC was achieved more rapidly in the SE group (2.0 ± 1.5 days vs 3.9 ± 3.7 days [unadjusted], p = 0.023) and SE had a higher proportion of unadjusted DF/CF-ICU days (33.0 ± 32.0% vs 18.1 ± 16.4%, p = 0.020). SE was associated with an increased proportion of adjusted DF/CF-ICU days by multivariate linear regression (13.1% [95% CI 1.4-24.8%], p = 0.029) and with faster adjusted rate of DFC by multivariate Cox regression (RR 2.28 [95% CI 1.25-4.15, p = 0.007]). CONCLUSIONS: Shorter sedation exposure is associated with increased proportion of DF/CF-ICU days and more rapid DFC after DCL for trauma.

Analysis of Traumatic Axillo-Subclavian Vessel Injuries: Endovascular Management is a Viable Option to Open Surgical Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: In traumatic axillo-subclavian vessel injuries, endovascular repair has been increasingly described, despite ongoing questions regarding infection risk and long-term durability. We sought to compare the clinical and safety outcomes between endovascular and surgical treatment of traumatic axillo-subclavian vessel injuries. METHOD: A search query of the prospectively maintained PROOVIT registry for patients older than 18 years of age with a diagnosis of axillary or subclavian vessel injury between 2014-2019 was performed at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Patient demographics, severity of injury, Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), procedural interventions, complications, and patency outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients with traumatic axillo-subclavian vessel injuries were included. There were similar rates of penetrating and blunt injuries (48% vs. 52%, respectively). Eighteen patients (78%) underwent intervention: 11 underwent endovascular stenting or diagnostic angiography; 7 underwent open surgical repair. There was similar severity of arterial injuries between the endovascular and open surgical groups: transection (30% vs. 40%, respectively), occlusion (30% vs. 40%, respectively). The open surgical group had worse initial clinical comorbidities: higher ISS scores (17.0 vs 13.5, p = 0.034), higher median MESS scores (6 vs. 3.5, P = 0.001). The technical success for the endovascular group was 100%. The endovascular group had a lower estimated procedural blood loss (27.5 mL vs. 624 mL, P = 0.03). The endovascular arterial group trended toward a shorter length of hospital stay (5.6 days vs. 27.6 days, P = 0.09) and slightly reduced procedural time (191.0 min vs. 223.5 min, P = 0.165). Regarding imaging follow up (average of 60 days post-discharge), 7 patients (54%) underwent surveillance imaging (5 with duplex ultrasound, 2 with computed tomography angiography CTA) that demonstrated 100% patency. Regardless of ISS or MESS scores, at long term clinical follow up (average of 214 days), there were no limb losses, graft infections or vascular complications in either the endovascular or open surgical group. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment is a viable option for axillo-subclavian vessel injuries. Preliminary results demonstrate that endovascular treatment, when compared to open surgical repair, can have similar rates of technical success and long-term outcomes in patency, infection and vascular complications.